Legal Opinion
Raunela v. Hertz Corp.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 6, 1972PublishedCited by 159 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQuirico, J.
This is an action in tort for negligence in which Helena M. Raunela, individualy, seeks to recover for personal injuries sustained by her in an automobile accident, and in which she also seeks recovery, in her capacity as administratrix of the estate of her late husband, Mauno Raunela, for his conscious suffering and death resulting from the same accident. The defendants are The Hertz Corporation (Hertz) and Agnes D. Leahey as administratrix of the estate of her late husband Philip M. Leahey (Leahey) whose death also resulted from the same accident. The accident involved a collision between a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Peterson v. HopsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Hennessey v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Kelly v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Hathaway v. Checker Taxi Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Lemay v. Springfield Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by159 opinions
- Mullins v. Pine Manor CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- International Fidelity Insurance v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Foley v. Polaroid Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Poirier v. Town of PlymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Norton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.