Legal Opinion

Shingleton v. State

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1963No. 182PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMooRE, J.

The State of North Carolina owns a large .body of land in Pender County, known as the Holly Shelter Wildlife Area. It is managed ,by the North Carolina Wildlife Resource® Commission. No public roads or highway® adjoin or oros® any portion of the Wildlife Area involved in this action. The roads within the area are owned by defendants and used in connection with wildlife management.

There was a dispute between defendants and plaintiff Slhingleton with respect to- the ownership and location of certain land®- within the boundaries of the Area. A suit was instituted, but before trial a compromise…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Weyerhaeuser Company v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Davis v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Davis v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. BowmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Corum v. University of North CarolinaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Fabrikant v. Currituck CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. Hensley v. RamseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API