Legal Opinion

Hensley v. Ramsey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 31, 1973No. 77PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOBBITT, Chief Justice.

At the conclusion of plaintiffs’ evidence defendant moved for a directed verdict in his favor “for lack of the plaintiffs’ evidence to sustain a case against the defendant.” The record indicates the court then heard argument by defendant’s counsel in support of this motion but is silent as to the content of such argument. Defendant’s motion was denied. At the conclusion of all'the evidence the record shows simply: “Defendant renews his motion for directed verdict. Motion denied.”

Nothing in the record indicates that defendant, subsequent to the return of the verdict,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  3. Globe Liquor Co. v. San RomanSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Shingleton v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Hege v. SellersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Britt v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Feibus & Co., Inc. v. Godley Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Yount v. LoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API