Legal Opinion
Altschul v. Salinas
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 18, 1999No. AC 17765PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, J.
The plaintiff, Lindsey Altschul, appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of his administrative appeal. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that (1) the trial court improperly determined that he refused to submit to a breath test pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 14-227b (f), now § 14-227b (g),1 and (2) § 14-227b is constitutionally defective. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
*393On May 26, 1997, at approximately 2:11 a.m., a state trooper observed the plaintiff operating a motor vehicle in an erratic manner on Interstate 84 and made the plaintiff stop his…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Connecticut v. DoehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- People v. SudduthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Buckley v. MuzioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Altschul v. SalinasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Pizzo v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Tompkins v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Gonzalez v. State Elections Enforcement CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- State v. WeedConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.