Legal Opinion

Pizzo v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 3, 2001No. AC 19819PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DALY, J.

The plaintiff, Frank S. Pizzo, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his appeal from the decision of the defendant commissioner of motor vehicles (commissioner) to suspend his license to operate a motor vehicle for refusal to submit to a chemical alcohol test pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 1999) § 14-227b1 following his arrest for *573operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that substantial evidence existed on the record to uphold the hearing…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Schallenkamp v. DelPonteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. O'Rourke v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  4. Demma v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  5. Schallenkamp v. DelponteConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Roy v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  2. Santiago v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  3. State v. CzyzewskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. Adams v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  5. Wolf v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API