Legal Opinion
Tompkins v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 28, 2000No. AC 19412PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’CONNELL, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his appeal from the *831decision of the defendant commissioner of motor vehicles (commissioner) suspending his license to operate a motor vehicle pursuant to General Statutes § 14-227b (b).1 The plaintiff claims that (1) the court improperly concluded that there was substantial evidence in the record to support the finding that the plaintiff refused to take a breath test and (2) he was denied due process of law. We affirm the .judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Finkenstein v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Bialowas v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Bancroft v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- O'Rourke v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Winsor v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. WeedConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Dore v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Lomen v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Wolf v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.