Williams v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The principal issue in this appeal concerns the choice of state law applicable to this insurance contract dispute, involving an automobile accident that occurred in New York state. The plaintiff, Mark *361Williams, a resident of Connecticut, appeals1 from the judgment of the trial court denying his application to vacate the award of an arbitration panel in favor of the defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. The panel applied New York law rather than Connecticut law to the dispute, and concluded that the plaintiff was not entitled to recovery under New York law. The plaintiff…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- O'Connor v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Chmielewski v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Winner v. RatzlaffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Haynes v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GilletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Powell v. Infinity InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Bensmiller v. E.I. Dupont de Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.