Legal Opinion
State v. Womack
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 14, 1973No. 42494PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.
The respondent was arrested by a state highway patrolman who, having reasonable cause to believe that the respondent was driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, advised him of his rights under RCW 46.20.308, the implied consent law, and the consequences of exercising those rights. When the patrolman asked the respondent to submit to a breath test for blood alcohol content, he refused.
In due course and according to the statutory procedure, the respondent’s license was revoked. He was informed of his right to a formal hearing and availed himself of that right. On February 4,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Universal Insurance v. RansonWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Arneson v. ArnesonWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Kataisto v. LowWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Lewis v. Department of Motor VehiclesWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Insurance Co. of North America v. KueckelhanWashington Supreme Court · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Nowell v. Department of Motor VehiclesWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- Fisher v. World-Wide Trophy OutfittersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Metcalf v. Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Department of Motor Vehicles v. AndersenWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Hering v. Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.