Legal Opinion
Fisher v. World-Wide Trophy Outfitters
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 29, 1976No. 1554-3PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.
The sole issue presented is whether the trial court erred in entering conclusion of. law No. 4:
The Consumer Protection Act, RCW 19.86 does not apply in this type of case and, therefore, the plaintiffs’ claim against the defendants under the Act for damages, exemplary damages and attorney’s fees, is denied.
Plaintiffs argue that the Consumer Protection Act applies and they should be awarded exemplary damages and attorney’s fees. On the other hand, defendants contend that we cannot reach this issue because the record on appeal is insufficient to resolve it. Consequently, defendants’ brief fails…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Algoma Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Lightfoot v. MacDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Johnston v. Beneficial Management Corp. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Exposition Press, Inc. And Edward Uhlan v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Koch v. Federal Trade CommmissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Keyes v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- Haner v. Quincy Farm Chemicals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
- Robinson v. Avis Rent a Car System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Robinson v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Pacesetter Real Estate, Inc. v. FasulesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.