Legal Opinion

Arneson v. Arneson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1951No. 31586PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

— Because of the state of the record in this case, we can pass only upon the question of the jurisdiction of the court to enter the judgment herein. The part objected to reads as follows:

“It Is Further Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the following real estate situate in King County, State of Washington, to-wit:
“Lots 7 and 8, Block 39, Burns & Atkinson’s Addition, be and hereby is awarded to the defendant for the following purposes, that is to say: that the defendant be and hereby is ordered and directed to sell the said property and the proceeds from said sale are to he used as follows:…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murray v. MurrayWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Anderson v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Swanson v. SwansonWashington Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Dennis J. Britt, Trustee of Frank James Damson, Bankrupt v. Alice J. DamsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. Decker v. DeckerWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  4. In re the Marriage of BueckingWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Lee v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API