Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Department of Motor Vehicles

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1972No. 42452PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

The Department of Motor Vehicles seeks reversal of a superior court decision, holding a department driver’s license revocation order invalid. The superior court found the “sworn report” required by RCW 46.20.308(3) is a prerequisite to department revocation action and an essential element in the department’s prima facie case.

We conclude that the license revocation provisions of RCW 46.20 make submission of the “sworn report” unnecessary in a de novo review by a superior count of the department’s order.

The license revocation provisions are contained in RCW 46.20.308(3), (4), and (5). These…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Foster v. Carson School District No. 301Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Cuddy v. State Department of Public AssistanceWashington Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Metcalf v. Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  2. State v. DykstraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  3. State v. DykstraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. Broom v. Department of LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  5. Binckley v. Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API