Legal Opinion

Pipkin v. Lentz

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided April 7, 1961PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShriver, J.

The parties will be referred to as complainant and defendant as they appeared in the Court below.

I

The defendant, Cordon Pipkin, seeks to have two separate conveyances of real estate declared void for fraud and for such inadequate consideration as to shock the conscience of the Court.

As is alleged in the bill, the complainant was born Cordon Howell but on February 7, 1939 he was adopted by Homer F. Pipkin and wife Louise Pipkin and bis name changed to Cordon Pipkin.

It is alleged and shown that in January 1947 Louise Pipkin acquired the real estate involved in this litigation by warranty deed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Grimes v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Larue v. Greene County BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  3. A. Landreth Co. v. SchevenelTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Woodfolk v. MarleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Bevins v. LivesayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Richards v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
  2. Coleman v. Community Trust Bank, N.A. (In Re Coleman)District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2003
  3. Pickens v. DaughertyTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Jackson v. Travelers Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1975
  5. Cardwell v. HackettCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API