Legal Opinion

A. Landreth Co. v. Schevenel

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1899PublishedCited by 29 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal from Chancery Court of Shelby County. Jno. L. T. Sneed, Ch.

1Opinion of the Court

McFaelaND, Sp. J.

This was a bill filed by the A. Landreth Co. against A. W. Schevenel & Co. for the purpose of rescinding and setting aside a settlement made between the parties, and also to subject certain real estate to the payment of complainant’s debts, conveyed by Schevenel, one of the partners, to his wife.

The facts are that A. W. Schevenel & Co., a firm composed of A. W. Schevenel and one Pace, was doing business in Memphis, Tennessee, in 1897. Beginning with August 20, 1897, the complainants sold to A. W. Schevenel & Co. goods amounting to sixteen hundred and ninety-six and TVo-…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Grimes v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Schiffer v. . DietzNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Bethell v. BethellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Burt v. BowlesIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Bigham v. BighamTexas Supreme Court · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Webber v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Fowler v. Happy Goodman FamilyTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  3. United States Textiles, Inc. v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc. And Busch Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Brungard v. Caprice Records, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  5. Dozier v. Hawthorne Development Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API