Richards v. Taylor
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McMURRAY, Judge.
The dispositive issue in this ease is whether the consideration recited in a warranty deed from the plaintiffs to the defendants is so vague and uncertain as to render the deed subject to rescission. The chancellor held that it was and ordered the deed set aside. We respectfully disagree and reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The material facts leading to the execution of the warranty deed are not in dispute. The facts subsequent to the execution, delivery and recording of the warranty deed are highly contested. The material facts occurring after the execution of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bob Pearsall Motors, Inc. v. Regal Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Thornburg v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
- Adams v. Dean Roofing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
- James Cable Partners, L.P. v. City of JamestownCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
- Cross v. EarlsTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- GuestHouse International, LLC v. Shoney's North America Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2010
- Peerless Wall & Window Coverings, Inc. v. Synchronics, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- State v. CunninghamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- In Re: Application of Tony Cox (seeking to qualify as agent for Memphis Bonding) and State of Tennessee v. Cheryl D. Gray and Samuel R. BriscoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2012
- Maverick Group Marketing, Inc. v. Worx Environmental Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.