In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcGee Brown, J.
{¶ 1} In the case below, the Public Utilities Commission allowed the American Electric Power operating companies (“AEP”) to recover certain costs arising from a pair of discounted-rate arrangements. Industrial Energy Users-Ohio (“IEU”) opposed AEP’s application and now appeals. IEU fails to demonstrate reversible error, however, and we affirm.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
{¶ 2} As previously ordered by the commission, AEP had been providing service to a pair of manufacturing customers at discounted rates. 1 “[T]he difference between what AEP would have collected from [these customers]…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Utility Service Partners, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
- In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
- Ohio Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- In re Application of Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Application of Ohio Power Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- In re Ohio Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- In re Application of Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2026