Legal Opinion

In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 2011No. 2010-1073PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGee Brown, J.

{¶ 1} In the case below, the Public Utilities Commission allowed the American Electric Power operating companies (“AEP”) to recover certain costs arising from a pair of discounted-rate arrangements. Industrial Energy Users-Ohio (“IEU”) opposed AEP’s application and now appeals. IEU fails to demonstrate reversible error, however, and we affirm.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

{¶ 2} As previously ordered by the commission, AEP had been providing service to a pair of manufacturing customers at discounted rates. 1 “[T]he difference between what AEP would have collected from [these customers]…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Utility Service Partners, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Ohio Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. In re Application of Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Application of Ohio Power Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. In re Ohio Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. In re Application of Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API