Gillis v. ALEUTIANS EAST BOROUGH
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WINFREE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The superior court interpreted a statutory preference for the purchase of state land in a manner disqualifying an applicant. Because the superior court correctly interpreted the statute, we affirm its decision.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
In accordance with article VIII, section 10 of the Alaska Constitution, the legislature enacted the Alaska Land Act shortly after statehood, providing in part "for the selection, acquisition, management, and disposal of Alaska lands and resources. 1 In 1984 the legislature amended the Act, adding a provision granting those…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- City & Borough of Juneau v. ThibodeauAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Matanuska-Susitna Borough v. HammondAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Premera Blue Cross v. State, Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development, Division of InsuranceAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Madison v. Alaska Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Alaska Trustee, LLC v. BachmeierAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Tweedy v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough Board of Adjustment and AppealsAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- M.M., through his next friend Erin Kirkland v. State of Alaska, Department of Administration, Office of Public Advocacy, Leslie Ridle, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Department of Administration, and Chad Holt, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Public AdvocacyAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
- All Am. Oilfield, LLC v. Cook Inlet Energy, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Alaska Trustee, LLC v. BachmeierAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.