Premera Blue Cross v. State, Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development, Division of Insurance
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
These consolidated appeals concern Alaska's retaliatory tax statute as applied to Premera Blue Cross, a Washington non-profit corporation registered as a hospital and medical services corporation in Alaska. By stipulation and by engaging Blue Cross's refund request on the merits, the Division of Insurance waived its right to argue that Blue Cross should be precluded from seeking a refund because it did not pay its 1995 and 1996 taxes under formal protest. We therefore reach the merits of this case, concluding that retaliatory taxes apply to Blue Cross. We…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Concerned Citizens of South Kenai Peninsula v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Alaska Pacific Assurance Co. v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. DeShongAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Marathon Oil Co. v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- City of Valdez v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Estate of Kim Ex Rel. Alexander v. CoxeAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. Planned Parenthood of the Great NorthwestAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP v. State, Department of AdministrationAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.