Legal Opinion

Roche v. Young Bros., Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 10, 1998No. 24829PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

TOAL, Justice:

This case involves a default judgment in a negligence action. George Roche originally brought this negligence action against Respondent Young Brothers, d/b/a Days Inn East (“Young Brothers”), as a result of a slip-and-fall accident in Young Brothers’ motel parking lot. Petitioner Catherine Roche, as personal representative of her husband’s estate, appeals the Court of Appeals’ decision that Young Brothers’ consent was required prior to the circuit court appointing a special referee to consider the damages matter. We reverse and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Roche v. Young Bros., Inc., of FlorenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  2. Howard v. Holiday Inns, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  3. Miller v. City of West ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  4. South Carolina Tax Commission v. Gaston Copper Recycling Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  5. Starkey v. BellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Broadhurst v. City of Myrtle Beach Election CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Austin v. Specialty Transportation Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Patel v. PatelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  4. Limehouse v. HulseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  5. South Carolina Department of Transportation v. FaulkenberryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API