Legal Opinion
South Carolina Department of Transportation v. Faulkenberry
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided September 7, 1999No. 3043PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
In this condemnation case, the trial court determined the South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT) should pay landowner J. Larry Faulkenberry interest, pursuant to S.C.Code Ann. § 28-2-420 (1991), on fifty percent of SCDOT’S pre-judgment payment to Faulkenberry from the date of the filing of the condemnation notice to the date of the jury verdict. In a supplemental order, the trial court ordered SCDOT to pay post-judgment interest on the interest awarded. SCDOT appeals. We reverse and remand.
FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY
SCDOT filed an action on May 27, 1994, to condemn 1,709.4 acres of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Phelps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- TNS Mills, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Stewart & Grindle, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Mid-State Distributors, Inc. v. Century Importers, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Vick v. South Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Evans v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- South Carolina Department of Transportation v. First Carolina Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Office of Regulatory Staff v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- South Carolina Department of Transportation v. PowellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.