Legal Opinion
Limehouse v. Hulsey
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 26, 2013No. Appellate Case No. 2011-196246; Appellate Case No. 2010-151573; No. 27279PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beatty
Lawton Limehouse, Sr. (“Father”) and Lawton Limehouse, Jr. (“Son”) separately sued Paul Hulsey, an attorney, and Hulsey’s law practice (collectively, “Hulsey”) for defamation arising out of statements Hulsey made regarding L & L Services, LLC (“L & L”), a staffing agency owned and operated by Father and Son. Hulsey removed the case to federal court based on an underlying RICO action1 involving the *96operation of L & L. The federal court remanded the case to state court on the ground it lacked federal question jurisdiction over the issues presented. After the remand, the state court clerk of…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rockwell International Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Paul Hulsey v. Frank CisaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- Maybank v. BB&T Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
- State v. RettigUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. RettigUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- Beach First National Bank v. Estate of GurnhamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.