Legal Opinion

Roche v. Young Bros., Inc., of Florence

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 3, 1995No. 24228PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeal’s decision in Roche v. Young Brothers, Inc., 313 S.C. 356, 437 S.E. (2d) 560 (Ct. App. 1993). We reverse the Court of Appeals and reinstate the entry of default by the clerk of court for Florence County under Rule 55(a), SCRCP. We reverse the trial judge’s denial of a new hearing on damages. We vacate the judgment of default and remand to the circuit court for a damages hearing as required by Rule 5(a), SCRCP.

FACTS

George Roche was injured when he slipped and fell at a Days Inn motel owned by Young Brothers. On June 4, 1990,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Magnaflux Corporation v. FoersterDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1963
  2. Foster v. CrawfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
  3. Kroetz v. AFT-Davidson Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1984
  4. Pioneer Utilities Corporation v. Scott-Newcomb, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
  5. Roche v. Young Bros., Inc. of FlorenceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Colleton Preparatory Academy, Inc. v. Hoover Universal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  2. Sundown Operating Co. v. Intedge Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  3. BB & T v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  4. Roche v. Young Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  5. Bowman v. Weeks Marine, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1996

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API