Broadhurst v. City of Myrtle Beach Election Commission
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, Justice:
This is an appeal from an election protest. Respondent City of Myrtle Beach Election Commission (Election Commission) denied -the protest. The circuit court reversed, granting the protest and ordering a new election on a limited basis. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS
Appellant/Respondent Broadhurst (Broadhurst), Respondent/Appellant Cain (Cain), and Respondent Chestnut (Chestnut) were candidates in a three-way runoff election for two seats on the Myrtle Beach City Council. At the November 16, 1999, election, voters were permitted to vote for two candidates. 1 After…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Kiriakides v. United Artists Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Byrd v. Irmo High SchoolSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Garner Ex Rel. Estate of Garner v. HouckSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Hainer v. American Medical International, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Horn v. Davis Electrical Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- State v. SweatSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Auto Owners Insurance v. RollisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Sloan Construction Co. v. Southco Grassing, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Stardancer Casino, Inc. v. StewartSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- State v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.