Legal Opinion

Broadhurst v. City of Myrtle Beach Election Commission

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 28, 2000No. 25191PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Justice:

This is an appeal from an election protest. Respondent City of Myrtle Beach Election Commission (Election Commission) denied -the protest. The circuit court reversed, granting the protest and ordering a new election on a limited basis. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

Appellant/Respondent Broadhurst (Broadhurst), Respondent/Appellant Cain (Cain), and Respondent Chestnut (Chestnut) were candidates in a three-way runoff election for two seats on the Myrtle Beach City Council. At the November 16, 1999, election, voters were permitted to vote for two candidates. 1 After…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Kiriakides v. United Artists Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. Byrd v. Irmo High SchoolSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Garner Ex Rel. Estate of Garner v. HouckSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Hainer v. American Medical International, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Horn v. Davis Electrical Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State v. SweatSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  2. Auto Owners Insurance v. RollisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Sloan Construction Co. v. Southco Grassing, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  4. Stardancer Casino, Inc. v. StewartSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  5. State v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API