Legal Opinion
Capri Jewelry Incorporated and Tancer & Two, Inc. v. Hattie Carnegie Jewelry Enterprises, Ltd., and Bill G. James
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 26, 1976No. 750, Docket 75-7604PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Hattie Carnegie Jewelry Enterprises, Ltd. (Hattie Carnegie) appeals from an order of the District Court for the Southern District of New York in an action brought against it by two distributors of costume jewelry, Capri Jewelry Incorporated (Capri) and Tancer & Two, Inc. (T&T).
Hattie Carnegie has been licensed 1 by Bill G. James, a resident of California who was named as a defendant but has not been served, to make or have made for it color-change rings under James’ Patent No. 8,802,945 (the Patent), entitled “Heat Sensitive Novelty Device.” The special…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Royal Typewriter Co. v. Remington Rand, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Leesona Corporation v. Varta Batteries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Gemveto Jewelry Co., Inc. v. Jeff Cooper Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Meeropol v. NizerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- David Cohn v. Coleco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Delano Farms Co. v. California Table Grape CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.