Legal Opinion
Royal Typewriter Co. v. Remington Rand, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 21, 1948No. 222, Docket 20895PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
Judge Smith’s opinion in the district-court has been published, 1 and states the disclosure in substance and the claims in full. We shall assume a familiarity with it in what we say and confine our discussion to the only issue in dispute — infringement. As a preliminary it is to be observed that the defendant concedes 'the claims in suit to be valid; a concession we shall accept, although the Supreme Court has said that, when the defendant challenges the validity of claims as well as their-infringement, it is better practice to pass, on their validity. 2 At first blush…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Festo Corporation v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., Ltd., A/K/A Smc Corporation, and Smc Pneumatics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- K-2 Corporation v. Salomon S.A. And Salomon/north America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- The Laitram Corporation and Intralox, Inc. v. Cambridge Wire Cloth CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Trio Process Corporation, in No. 71-1295 v. L. Goldstein's Sons, Inc., in No. 71-1296Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.