Villanueva v. Board of Psychologist Examiners
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.
The Board of Psychologist Examiners has petitioned for reconsideration of our opinion in Villanueva v. Board of Psychologist Examiners, 175 Or App 345, 27 P3d 1100 (2001). The Board argues that we did not consider whether the failure to give petitioner notice prejudiced him and that, at a minimum, we should remand the case so that it can issue an amended notice of hearing. We allow the petition for reconsideration and adhere to our opinion.
As we explained in our initial opinion, the Board charged petitioner with violating six ethical rules. Despite petitioner’s repeated requests to clarify…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. WimberOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Oregon Health Care Ass'n v. Health DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- Cheryl Wilcox Property Management v. AppelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Villanueva v. Board of Psychologist ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. AlbenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. T. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- State v. B. L. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
- OR-OSHA v. Loy Clark Pipeline, Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- Ceaser v. Dept. of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Drayton v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.