Legal Opinion

Cole v. FOGEL

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1957PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKester, J.

This is a suit to impress a resulting trust in favor of plaintiff on certain lands which were deeded to the defendant, lone Fogel. Defendants in their answer denied the trust and claimed affirmatively that the deed to lone Fogel was in fact a mortgage to secure a debt, and they sought to foreclose the mortgage. The trial court held that both sides had failed to prove their respective contentions and denied each party the requested relief, and a decree was entered purporting to merge in defendants all legal and equitable estate in the disputed property. Plaintiff appeals from that decree.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holohan v. McCarthyOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Umpqua Forest Industries v. Neenah-Oregon Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Bogle v. PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Kramer v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Blue River Sawmills, Ltd. v. GatesOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Matter of Estate of HurlbuttCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. Adamson v. AdamsonOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Heintz v. SINNER ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Cheryl Wilcox Property Management v. AppelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API