Navas v. City of Springfield

Defendant appeals a judgment that awarded plaintiff retirement benefits. Defendant argues that the trial court erred in denying its motion to dismiss under ORCP 21A(8). We reverse.

Plaintiff alleges that in October, 1986, he began working for defendant as afirefighter/paramedic. His employment entitled him to participate in an employee retirement plan. Under the plan, defendant contributed 7% of the employee’s pay into a “Participant’s Pick-up Account,” and 10% of the employee’s pay into a “Participant’s Employer Contribution Account.” Subject to certain conditions, employees are entitled to…