Legal Opinion

Fagg v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1933PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action by Orsa Fagg against the Massachusetts Bonding Insurance Company on an insurance policy to recover for personal injuries and property damage. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.

AFFIRMED. REHEARING DENIED. During December, 1928, the defendant, Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company, issued to one William King an automobile liability and property damage policy of insurance covering a Packard automobile then owned by King. The policy provided that the insurance company "does hereby agree * * *;

"To extend the indemnity provided by this policy so as to be…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Oregon v. Portland Gen. Elec. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Milwaukee Mechanics' Ins. v. B. S. Rhea & SonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
  3. Cranston v. West Coast Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Mercer v. Germania Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Davidson v. Hawkeye InsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Virginia Auto Mutual Insurance v. BrillhartSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  2. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Didlake v. Standard Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  4. W. S. Maxwell Co. v. Southern Oregon Gas Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Harbor Insurance v. PaulsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API