Legal Opinion
People v. Beasley
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 13, 1967No. Crim. No. 5309PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtElkington, J.
The People appeal from an order setting aside an information (Pen. Code, § 995) and from a certain order suppressing evidence.
Following a preliminary hearing commencing November 18, *741964, at which defendants were held to answer a charge of receiving stolen property, the District Attorney of Contra Costa County, on December 4, 1964, filed a two-count information charging that defendants Beasley and Reed did, on or about August 28, 1964, burglarize premises located at 588 Spring Street, Richmond, California; and (in the alternative) did buy and receive certain property, i.e., a Miller Falls…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. KeenanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.