Legal Opinion

People v. Cataline

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 18, 1921No. Crim. No. 1002PublishedCited by 17 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of grand larceny and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

The only question presented for determination is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict.

The evidence tended to show that the property forming the object of the larceny, a Chandler motor-car, belonged to one Grant Falkenstein. The defendant, upon his arrest in San Francisco, denied his identity, but when shown his picture and confronted by a detective from a neighboring city he admitted that his name was Cataline. He also denied that he had stolen the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. VidalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. People v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. WissenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. People v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. People v. SorrentinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. People v. HollandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. People v. SwansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API