Legal Opinion

Barnes v. City of Dayton

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1965PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

Appellants Barnes and Ballard filed the bill herein for the purpose of seeking a declaration as to the constitutionality of an ordinance passed by the City of Dayton, a municipal corporation, prohibiting the sale of beer for consumption, etc., as more specifically detailed hereafter. The Chancellor sustained a demurrer ■ to the bill and from his action this appeal has been prosecuted.

The ordinance assaulted in this proceeding was passed by the City of Dayton on December 31, 1964, and is entitled:

An ordinance prohibiting the sale of beer without a permit and prohibiting the issuance of license…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  2. Shousha v. Matthews Drivurself Service, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Smiddy v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Grubb v. Mayor Aldermen, MorristownTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Aladdin Industries, Inc. v. Associated Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of Lebanon v. BairdTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County v. ShacklettTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  3. METRO. GOV'T OF NASHVILLE, ETC. v. ShacklettTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Memphis Retail Liquor Dealers' Ass'n v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Haines v. Metropolitan Government of Davidson CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API