Legal Opinion

Smiddy v. City of Memphis

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1918PublishedCited by 32 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal from the Chan'cery Court of Shelby County. — Hon. F. H. Heiskell, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lansden

This suit was brought by complainant to recover from the city of Memphis a balance alleged to be due as salary as a member of the fire department. The suit is intended as a test case; and, while the amount claimed by complainant is small, the total amount due, or alleged to be due, those within complainant’s class is $7,500.

*100Prior to the passage of the act hereafter mentioned, complainant was receiving a salary of $100 per month as a member of the-fire department of the city of Memphis. By an act of the legislature passed April 3 and approved April 6, 1917, the city of Memphis was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Malone v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Prescott v. DuncanTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Stratton v. MorrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Grainger County v. State ex rel. MynattTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Myar v. MitchellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Highwoods Properties, Inc. v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People Ex Rel. Moshier v. City of SpringfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State Ex Rel. Bales v. Hamilton CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  4. City of Elizabethton v. Carter CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  5. City of Providence v. MoultonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1932

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API