Legal Opinion
Haines v. Metropolitan Government of Davidson County
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided July 17, 1998No. 3:96-1085PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ECHOLS, Chief Judge.
Presently pending before the Court are the following motions: (1) Plaintiffs’ Second Motion to Amend (Docket Entry No. 8), to which Defendants have not responded; (2) Defendant Metropolitan Board of Public Education’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket Entry No. 4), to which Plaintiffs respond in opposition; and (3) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Entire Case (Docket Entry No. 13), to which Plaintiffs also respond in opposition. For the reasons explained herein, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Second Motion to Amend. Plaintiffs shall file an Amended Complaint…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lopez v. Regents of UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Dipippa v. Union School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Hornberger v. TennesseeDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2011
- Lamb v. Tenth Judicial District Drug Task ForceDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2013
- Wagner v. HaslamDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.