Legal Opinion

City of Lebanon v. Baird

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1988PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

Rule 11, T.R.A.P., Applications for Permission to Appeal were granted in this case to determine whether a contract entered into between Plaintiff, the City of Lebanon, and Defendant, Edward B. Baird, was ultra vires because it was not authorized by ordinance, as required by the Charter of the City of Lebanon. If not ultra vires, the issue becomes whether the City of Lebanon acted in good faith and with due diligence within the meaning of the terms of the contract, but if ultra vires, then whether an estoppel or an implied contract arose between the parties.

I

The events…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Bledsoe County v. McReynoldsTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Brown v. City of ManchesterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
  3. Marshall & Bruce Co. v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Rutherford v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  5. W. C. Early Co. v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1916

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Mike Allmand v. Jon PavleticTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Engenius Entertainment, Inc. v. HerentonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  3. Paduch v. City of Johnson CityTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Faust v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  5. Sexton v. Sevier CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API