Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance v. Reitler

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1981No. 80-261PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morrison

Plaintiff, Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate) brought this action in the District Court asserting that it was entitled to subrogation to the extent of payments Allstate had made under a medical payments provision of an automobile policy. Defendants answered by alleging that such subrogation clauses are invalid. Both parties filed a motion for summary judgment. The District Court entered an order granting the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and denying the motion of the defendants. From this judgment, defendants appeal.

This case arises from an automobile accident which occurred in…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Fifield Manor v. FinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Travelers Indemnity Company v. ChumbleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Marks v. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. LeaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. Hospital Service Corp. v. Pennsylvania InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Youngblood v. American States InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Swanson v. Hartford Ins. Co. of MidwestMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Fisher v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Maxwell v. Allstate Insurance CompaniesNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Orden v. United Services Automobile Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API