Legal Opinion

DeCespedes v. Prudence Mut. Cas. Co. of Chicago, Ill.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 22, 1966No. 66-1PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

193 So.2d 224 (1966)

Praxedes DeCESPEDES, Gladys DeCespedes, and Frieda Castillo, Appellants,

v.

PRUDENCE MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, Appellee.

No. 66-1.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

November 22, 1966.

Rehearing Denied January 19, 1967.

Richard H. Reynolds, Miami, for appellants.

Hawkesworth & Kay, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.

SWANN, Judge.

The plaintiffs were injured when their automobile was involved in an accident with another automobile owned and operated by Tortfeasor, not a party to this suit. The plaintiffs admit to having…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Government Employees Insurance Company v. SweetDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  2. Bernardini v. Home & Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  3. Gatzweiler v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Harding v. Town of TownsendSupreme Court of Vermont · 1871
  5. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. CampbellSupreme Court of Florida · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Rimes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Continental Cas. Co. v. Ryan Inc. EasternSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  3. Silinsky v. State-Wide InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  4. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. VaccariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Allstate Insurance v. DrukeArizona Supreme Court · 1978

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API