Legal Opinion

Davenport v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1965No. 4880PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*363OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

This case was presented to the lower court on stipulated facts and is designed to test the validity of a clause in an automobile insurance policy which subrogates the company to the extent of the medical payments made by it to the assured, “to the proceeds of any settlement or judgment that may result from the exercise of any rights of recovery which the injured person or anyone receiving such payment may have against any person or organization * * The plaintiff below was State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company who had paid the sum of $1,565.78 to its…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fifield Manor v. FinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. In RE BEHM'S ESTATE. BEHM v. GeeUtah Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Richard v. National Transportation Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1936
  4. Reddy v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Hamm v. Carson City Nugget, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Silinsky v. State-Wide InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  3. Marks v. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. LeaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. Hospital Service Corp. v. Pennsylvania InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API