Legal Opinion

Security First National Bank v. Sartori

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 30, 1939No. Civ. 2309PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAINES, J., pro tem.

It appears that in the year 1921 defendant and appellant Severo Sartori obtained judgment on a promissory note in the principal sum of $350 executed to him by the defendant Bob Beretta. Subsequently he brought action upon this judgment and on April 12, 1926, obtained another judgment in renewal of it aggregating $566.45. Notwithstanding effort to realize on this judgment by execution and various supplementary proceedings the same remained unsatisfied and after five years had elapsed such proceedings were taken under section 685 of the Code of Civil Procedure that Sartori…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Doehla v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Davis & McMillan v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Steele v. . BenhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. Tremaine v. . MortimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Rossi v. CaireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Scheas v. RobertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Mercury Herald Co. v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Rombotis v. FinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Parker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. City & County of San Francisco v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API