State v. Jamerson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
Defendant first argues that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the defense of entrapment. We agree. In order to establish the defense of entrapment, the defendant must prove “(1) acts of persuasion, trickery or fraud carried out by law enforcement officers or their agents to induce a defendant to commit a crime, (2) . . . the criminal design originated in the minds of the government officials, rather than with the innocent defendant, such that the crime is the product of the creative activity of the law enforcement authorities.” State v. Walker, 295 N.C.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. BraunCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. HartmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. JarmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.