Legal Opinion

State v. Braun

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 6, 1976No. 7615SC339PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

The defendant assigns as error (1) the denial of his motion for nonsuit on the ground that the defense of entrapment had been established as a matter of law by the State’s evidence, and (2) that part of the trial judge’s charge which placed on defendant the burden of proving entrapment to the satisfaction of the jury, contending that placing this burden on the defendant violates the federal due process clause, U. S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1.

For his first assignment, defendant relies on State v. Stanley, 288 N.C. 19, 215 S.E. 2d 589 (1975), where the Supreme Court for the first time…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HagemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. AndersonHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. BranhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. JamersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API