Legal Opinion

State v. Hartman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1980No. 8027SC372PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

In his first assignment of error defendant asserts that both his statutory right to a speedy trial under G.S. 15A-701 and his right to a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution were violated. Defendant was indicted on 24 February 1979 and tried on 9 January 1980. He obtained two continuances during that time on the grounds that an essential witness was unavailable. In computing the elapsed time between indictment and trial, defendant’s counsel has excluded the time consumed by his continuances and has concluded that defendant was tried within…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. TolleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Sparks v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. State v. StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. HarrillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Community Newspaper Holdings, Inc. v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. State v. JamersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API