Legal Opinion

Geiser Manufacturing Co. v. Gray

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 12, 1910PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Potter County. Tried below before Hon. W. M. Jeter.

1Opinion of the Court

SPEER, Associate Justice.

This suit was instituted by the Geiser Manufacturing Company and was to recover upon a promissory note executed by H. A. Gray, the defendant in the action. The defendant interposed a special exception to the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s petition challenging the plaintiff’s right to institute and maintain this suit without an allegation in its petition that it had complied with article 745, Sayles’ Texas Civil Statutes, regulating the right of a foreign corporation to do business in this State. The trial court sustained this exception, and the plaintiff declining to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allen v. Tyson-Jones Buggy Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. King v. Monitor Drill CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  3. Keating Implement & MacHine Co. v. Favorite Carriage Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1896

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Tool & Supply Co. v. DanielsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  2. Kingman Texas Implement Co. v. BordersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Barton v. Kansas City Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Blackwell-Wielandy Book & Stationery Co. v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Gholson v. Wickwire Spencer Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API