Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Tool & Supply Co. v. Daniels

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 2, 1927No. 724-4648PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpeer, J.

This writ of error involves an interpretation of article 1536 of the Revised Civil Statutes of 1925. The action was by plaintiff in error against defendants in error upon a promissory note executed by the de-*728fendahts, in which the plaintiff pleaded that it was a corporation organized and doing ’¡business under the laws of the state of Oklahoma, and that it had been granted a permit authorizing it to transact business in the state of Texas.

The trial court heard the evidence, and entered judgment for the defendants. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed the judgment entered upon the merits, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. L. Miller & Co. v. GoodmanTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Allen v. Tyson-Jones Buggy Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Barcus v. J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Texas Packing Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of TexasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  5. Geiser Manufacturing Co. v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Commerce Trust Co. v. BestTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. The Continental Supply Co. v. HoffmanTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Fort Worth Stockyards Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  4. Cosey v. Supreme Camp of American WoodmenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Smith v. Jasper County Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API