Legal Opinion

Kingman Texas Implement Co. v. Borders

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 10, 1913PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Bexar County ; A. W. Seeligson, Judge. Action by the Kingman Texas Implement Company against W. P. Borders and others. Prom a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the petition, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtTaliaferro, J.

Appellant, the Kingman Texas Implement Company, a foreign corporation, filed this suit against W. F. Borders, Santos Reyes, James Hogan, Mrs. Exer Gleasner, Wm. Dóbrowolski, C.. A. Stieren, W. L. Word, Cornelia Word, Grace Sharp, and Daniel Rodriguez to recover from W. F. Borders on debt and foreclosure of a judgment lien on real estate in Bexar county and to establish and foreclose the judgment lien agáinst the other defendants, who were alleged to be claiming some interest in the land. Appellant alleged, as its cause of action, that on December 10, 1907, it obtained a judgment in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nye v. MoodyTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Texas Land & Mortgage Co. v. WorshamTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Gullett Gin Co. v. Oliver & GriggsTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Schneider v. DorseyTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Geiser Manufacturing Co. v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Farm & Home Savings & Loan Ass'n of Missouri v. MuhlCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Reyes v. Kingman Texas Implement Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Apostolic Church v. American Honda Motor Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1992
  4. Deveny v. Success Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Stephens County v. J. N. McCammon, Inc.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API