King v. Monitor Drill Company
Court of Appeals of Texas
Error from the District Court of Jefferson County. Tried below before Hon. A. T. Watts.
1Opinion of the Court
PLEASANTS, Associate Justice.
This suit was brought by defendant in error to recover upon a promissory note for the sum of $1,399.65 which purports to have been executed by C. S. King & Co. The original petition alleged that the note was executed and delivered by C. S. King & Co., a partnership composed of C. S. King and R. E. Gordon,
To this petition'the defendant King filed an answer consisting of general and special exceptions, and general denial, and special pleas denying, under oath, the' alleged partnership and the execution by it of the note.
The defendant- Gordon answered by general…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Frank v. TatumTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- L. Miller & Co. v. GoodmanTexas Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by14 opinions
- Studebaker Harness Co. v. Gerlach Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Geiser Manufacturing Co. v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Blackwell-Wielandy Book & Stationery Co. v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Texas Land & Cattle Co. v. MolinaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Blackwell-Wielandy Co. v. Sabine Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.