Legal Opinion
Berton v. All Persons, Etc.
California Supreme Court
Decided December 7, 1917No. S. F. No. 6873PublishedCited by 34 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. B. V. Sargent, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The above-entitled cause was heard in Department and the following opinion and decision handed down:
“The action was to quiet title. The appeal is from the judgment given in favor of defendants and against plaintiff.
‘ ‘ The common source of title was in Edward Franklin. He plotted his land, dividing it into numbered lots as shown by the accompanying diagram.
“Frank Place is thus shown as a awl de sac, extending to and abutting on the land of Hamilton, which land Franklin did not own. In 1853 Franklin began the sale of these lots. The first was of a lot described by metes and bounds,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Archer v. Salinas CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- The Title & Document Restoration Co. v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Town of San Leandro v. Le BretonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Williams v. Los Angeles Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Smith v. City of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Balthasar v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Hoyt v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Nutter v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- People v. Centr-O-MartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Gardner v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.