Legal Opinion
Wesselman v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 9, 2007No. Civil Action 07-00589 (ESH)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Herman Alphonse Wesselman filed a pro se complaint on March 26, 2007, seeking damages under 26 U.S.C. § 7431 based on “intentional, negligent, and/or grossly negligent disclosures of ‘[tax] return information’ ” by agents of the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). (Compl. ¶ 18.) The government has filed a motion to dismiss. For the reasons set forth herein, the motion will be granted.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs complaint closely resembles many of the other pro se tax complaints that have been filed in this Court. See, e.g., Glass v. United…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Shwarz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Lindsey v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Ross v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kim v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Scott v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Guthery v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Marsoun v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Lykens v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.