Legal Opinion
Lindsey v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 22, 2006No. Civil Action 05-1761(RBW)PublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WALTON, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, Steven J. Lindsey and Patricia L. Lindsey, bring this action alleging that the United States Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) “recklessly, intentionally or by reason of negligencef,] disregarded and continue to disregard provisions of [the Internal Revenue Code (‘IRC’),] Title 26 of the United States Code[,] and the regulations promulgated thereunder.” Complaint (“Compl.”) ¶ 1. In response to the complaint, the defendant initially filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that the plaintiffs failed to properly execute service of process…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Speelman v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Moore v. BushDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Constien v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Slate v. Public Defender Service for the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Ross v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.