Thompson v. Municipal Bond Company
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The plaintiff instituted this action on March 12, 1936, for the purpose of recovering the principal and interest of four promissory notes executed by the defendant on September 16, 1932, and made payable to plaintiff or order. The principal sum mentioned in each note was $3,045, and the due date specified in each instrument was October 1,1934. The complaint alleged that the consideration for the execution of each note was the postponement by the plaintiff of the payment of certain amounts which the defendant was obligated to pay to plaintiff by the terms of a written agreement entered into…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Westerfeld v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Tatterson v. KehrleinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Williams v. Hartford Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
- Coward v. ClantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jensen v. ChandlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
- Ross v. Frank W. Dunne Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Lee Young v. Jack Boring's, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Sauder v. DittmarCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Dessert Seed Co. v. GarbusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.