Legal Opinion

State v. Feinstein

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 16, 1983No. C7-83-530PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

This is a sentencing appeal that raises the issue of whether Minn.Stat. § 609.346, subd. 1 (1982), mandates not only the imposition but also the execution of a 3-year minimum term in the case of a second or subsequent sex offender under sections 609.342 to 609.-345. The trial court concluded that it had no choice but to execute the sentence in such a case even though the court believed that the defendant was particularly una-menable to imprisonment and particularly amenable to treatment in a probationary setting. See State v. Wright, 310 N.W.2d 461 (Minn.1981). However,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. State v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. State v. JonasonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. State v. MooseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. State v. ChildersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BluhmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. State v. SheppardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  3. State v. StaffordCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State v. StephanieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. BluhmCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API