State v. Feinstein
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
This is a sentencing appeal that raises the issue of whether Minn.Stat. § 609.346, subd. 1 (1982), mandates not only the imposition but also the execution of a 3-year minimum term in the case of a second or subsequent sex offender under sections 609.342 to 609.-345. The trial court concluded that it had no choice but to execute the sentence in such a case even though the court believed that the defendant was particularly una-menable to imprisonment and particularly amenable to treatment in a probationary setting. See State v. Wright, 310 N.W.2d 461 (Minn.1981). However,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. JonasonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. MooseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. ChildersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BluhmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. SheppardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. StaffordCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. StephanieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. BluhmCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.